Tag: Roe v. Wade

Nearly 1 in 3 employees considering leaving their organization over response to overturning of Roe v. Wade

A recent survey by global nonprofit Catalyst, which works to accelerate progress for women through workplace inclusion, reveals that nearly one in three employees (30%) are considering leaving their jobs due to their employer’s response to the US Supreme Court decision to overturn Roe v. Wade.

Almost half of those surveyed (44%) said their organizations and leaders are not doing enough to ensure abortion access. One third (33%) said they want their CEO to advocate for abortion rights.

When organizations took action, employees noticed. Employees were nearly twice as likely (83% vs 45%) to say that their organization genuinely cares about addressing employee needs if their organization took action in response to Roe v. Wade being overturned.

Lorraine Hariton, Catalyst’s President and CEO said: “Employees are assessing their careers and making decisions based on how their leaders address this issue. Clear communication and meaningful action go a long way.”

Catalyst’s September 2022 survey of more than 1,000 adults working in the US examined how employers’ action or inaction around abortion access has impacted employees’ feelings about their workplaces and career pathways.

Employees say their companies are not doing enough when it comes to abortion access.

Two-fifths (44%) of employees said their organizations and leaders are not doing enough to ensure abortion access. That number is higher among younger employees, with more than half (52%) of employees ages 18-34 (57% of women, 48% of men) saying their organization is not doing enough to ensure abortion access for employees (by providing healthcare plans that cover abortion or covering travel expenses for abortion care, for example).

Employers are not communicating clearly with their workers about reproductive benefits and policies.

More than half (59%) of employees want more clarity and transparency about their organization’s policies on reproductive healthcare. That number is higher for younger employees, with more than two-thirds (69%) of employees ages 18-34 (70% women, 69% men) wanting more clarity on those benefits.

Employees want their organizations to provide abortion benefits.

More than half (52%) of employees aged 18 to 34 (57% of women, 47% of men) say they would likely use employer-provided financial or travel benefits to access abortion care if they or their partner needed them.

One in three (34%) respondents said they would not be able to afford to travel for an abortion without financial assistance from their organization. Additionally, 37% of respondents said they would not be able to get time off work to travel for an abortion without assistance from their organization, such as written policies, benefits, or manager support.

Younger employees are making career decisions based on how their employers address abortion access.

Younger employees ages 18 to 34 are particularly concerned about their career pathways post-Roe. Nearly half (46%) of employees ages 18-34 (47% of women, 44% of men) are concerned that they won’t have the career they planned because Roe v. Wade has been overturned.

Share this article on social media

Employers will need to follow local, state and federal laws and regulations regarding abortion

Emily Dickens, Chief of Staff and Head of Government Affairs at Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) has stated that the US Supreme Court’s decision overturning Roe v. Wade will have an effect on the world of work. The organization said it will also provide up-to-date resources for employers without weighing in on whether abortion is right or wrong.

Dickens said employers will need to follow local, state and federal laws and regulations regarding abortion. However, she noted self-insured companies are subject to the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act rather than state law, and that will provide broader flexibility in structuring health benefits.

She continued: “Some companies are announcing preemptive action to ensure workers have access to abortion services by increasing travel benefits to cover healthcare procedures. For example, new SHRM research shows that nearly a quarter of organizations agree that offering a health savings account to cover travel for reproductive care in another state will enhance their ability to compete for talent. But how these policies interact with state laws is unclear, and employers should be aware of the legal risks involved.”

SHRM also reported key findings from its research related to the topic:

  • 35% of organizations would not be more likely to provide travel expense benefits outside of a health savings account for employees to access reproductive services if it was tax deductible.
  • Knowing that employees can use HSA funds for travel-related expenses to receive reproductive care in another state, 87% of organizations still would not make any changes to the contributions they make to employees’ HSAs.
  • Paid time off was named the top resource currently provided to employees to better support reproductive care, cited by 32% of firms.
  • 29% of organizations said they would increase support within an employee assistance program for reproductive care in a post-Roe and Casey world.
  • 14% of organizations said they would include the topic of reproductive rights in their diversity, equity and inclusion programs.
Share this article on social media